there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.Īn added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while glossy might be desired for someone else. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.Īs an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to.

Without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. Feedback for the buildable category a rating of five indicates evaluating 'how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product?' heavily suggest builds easily.Īt blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. Considering the luster category the rating of two suggests reviewers considering the question 'how lustrous is this product?' somewhat indicate matte.

On the pigmentation category an average total of four is a sign that replies to 'how pigmented is this product?' somewhat suggest opaque. In the colour category the current five suggests responses to 'does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?' mostly responded true to colour. Looking at review rankings for the long-wearing category an average of two suggests users & critics when asked 'how long-wearing is this product?' mildly favor disappears quickly. Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews

Chanel rouge rebelle